Rust Belt Reader

December 12, 2009

Review: Crooked River Burning

Crooked River BurningWinegardner, Mark. Crooked River Burning. New York: Harvest Books, 2001.

Crooked River Burning has been in my to-read pile since 2006, when I bought a copy of Good Roots: Writers Reflect on Growing Up in Ohio, for which Mark Winegardner penned the afterword, “Toward a Literature of the Midwest.”

(Though I didn’t know it at the time, the roots of Rust Belt Reader took hold right then and there.)

In his afterword, Winegardner grimly recounts the following experience with his publishers, prior to the publication of Crooked River Burning:

We went into a big conference room. The marketing director started the meeting by saying (after admitting she hadn’t read the novel), “We see this as a strong regional book.” If it does well in the Midwest, she says, there’s hope it might catch on elsewhere.

They all seemed surprised when I asked if the elevator went to the roof, so I could go jump off.

However, this was long before All Things Local became the boutique obsession of the intellectual class, before consumers craved “authenticity” (a dressed-up marketing term for “slumming it”), before Detroit’s ruined urban landscape became emblematic of a corporate greed gone not just wild but metastatic, before recession chic became de rigueur in the Real Simple parlors of the elite.

So, given the enthusiasm heaped on American Rust (not to mention a whopping $400,000 advance; in a city where you can buy a house for the price of a VCR, do you know how many foreclosures that could forestall?), I can’t help but wonder if Winegardner’s publisher might cast a slightly more generous eye on the book now than they did in 2001. If for no other reason than its sheer, ambitious scope: in 561 pages, Winegardner sets out to answer a question that many a visitor to the American Rust Belt has undoubtedly asked: what the heck happened here, and why?

The story begins in 1948, not long before the Indians win the World Series — a time when young white kids listen furtively to something not-quite-rock ‘n roll-yet on scratchy transistor radios, a time of summer romances and soda pop and idling in your Uncle Stan’s Jeepster till the moon peeps out. A time when Cleveland is the Sixth Biggest City in the Greatest Country in the World.

It ends at the moment in the summer of 1969 when the sludge-fouled Cuyahoga River erupts in flames, propelling an increasingly jumpy and jaded city into a seemingly irreversible death-spiral.

In other words, the story follows the exact narrative any Cleveland old-timer will launch into directly before he says, “Eh, Cleveland’s a ghost town. Last one out, turn off the lights!”

On one level, Crooked River Burning is a fairly standard rendering of the age-old poor boy yearns after rich, untouchable girl scenario. (In truth, though, in a post-World War II industrial city, that “poor boy” is happily middle class.) However, since Cleveland is so astoundingly, unalterably doomed, and since the relationship between west-sider David Zielinsky and Shaker Heights-bred Anne O’Connor is going to parallel Cleveland’s demise, the reader can’t help but stick around to see how this thing is gonna crash and burn. Even if it does seem cruelly voyeuristic.

The chief flaw of Crooked River Burning lies in its greatest strength: though gratifyingly epic as Lord of the Rings, it is as if, when setting out to write this book, Mark Winegardner was afraid that this might be the only Cleveland novel ever written. It is not that he attempts too much — he pulls most of it off, anyway — but that he attempts so much that you expect everything to be in there, and it isn’t. (Most notably, there’s little to no mention of the auto industry.)

Is Crooked River Burning too regional? Peppered almost to the point of overload with local notables — including Eliot Ness, Dorothy Fuldheim, the infamous Dr. Sam Sheppard, and Carl Stokes — at times Crooked River Burning does seem like too much of a ham-handed local history lesson to interest anyone outside Cleveland. It’s hard to imagine Winegardner’s lengthy, ripped-straight-from-the-autobiography “Local Heroes” interludes in a novel set on the Upper West Side of Manhattan. (We’d all be expected to know who he was talking about, or at least pretend to, lest we look like rubes. Then again, perhaps the publisher insisted on them.) At times, I felt myself almost disoriented by reading a novel about Cleveland, as if it had been set there by mistake. (Oops! This one was supposed to be about Red Hook, but the typesetter accidentally put in “Cleveland.” Send this one off to Big Lots, wouldya?) Instead of the distinct Cleveland accent, I realized I was reading the part of political boss Tom O’Connor in the voice of controlling old Mr. Potter from It’s a Wonderful Life, or union tough Mike Zielinsky in the voice of Tony Soprano.

But the setting is never in doubt. It’s that penchant for evocative place-setting that sets Winegardner apart. At times I found myself taking highly personalized roadtrips from the storyline: during the summer of 1952, when David and Anne first meet on Kelleys Island, my dad is 11 years old, collecting freshwater clams on the mainland at Port Clinton. Later, as David looks out over the Detroit-Superior bridge, I wonder about who’s living in (what will become) my house, just a few miles west.

Does Crooked River Burning accomplish what it sets out to do? Does it capture a crucial moment in Rust Belt history? Yes. Does it provide a decent explanation for why, in order to live in Cleveland, “You Gotta Be Tough?” Somewhat. Good enough for many people.

But in attempting to answer this monumental why, Winegardner also suggests that maybe, just maybe, the question itself is Cleveland’s problem. That this question is part and parcel of a deeply-ingrained civic neurosis, whose other chief features include the muttered apologies for never quite measuring up, the heartbreakingly childish search for that One Big Thing to take the blame (and on which to hang obviously doomed hopes, namely, counting on African-American Mayor Carl Stokes to singlehandedly resolve “the Negro problem”), the relentless moping (“it just figures that it would happen to Cleveland!” being the all-purpose answer to everything from the Hough Riots to Jim Brown’s sudden retirement from the NFL.)

There is a secret magic that librarians practice called readers’ advisory — that is, finding the right book for the right person at the right time. Readers’ advisory is a fickle and complex art that requires you to have a sharp understanding of the subtleties of human character. Why do people read what they like? Sometimes they can’t even tell you, so you have to consider other books that have moved them, that have done what they wanted a book to do (make them laugh? make them think? make them feel better about their own downtrodden situation because someone else is always worse off?) … and guess.

Who would I recommend Crooked River Burning to? Well, there is an offshoot of readers’ advisory called bibliotherapy. Bibliotherapy recognizes that reading can be a healing art, that it can bring catharsis. A bibliotherapist might give a child whose parent has died a book about another child whose parent has died.

Crooked River Burning is a therapeutic book not just for the reader who feels frustrated by his once-thriving city’s decline, but for the reader who takes that decline personally. It is a book that, if a reader was younger and sillier, he might keep on his bedside table like a nightlight, just so he knows it’ll be there when he’s most vulnerable.

In the end, it’s not so much answers that help, but stories. This is the conclusion that Anne O’Connor reaches at the end of the novel, shortly before the Cuyahoga River bursts into flame. She has a sudden vision of her brother, Steven, shot down over the Sea of Japan: “when she’d tried to write a novel about this, thinking that the story was so tragic and inevitable it would tell itself, she realized no story told itself. Stories are unruly. All a story can hope to be is a great unraveling of accepted truth. The mystery is the fact.”

6 Comments »

  1. Wow, thank you for doing this. It could be a great asset to the blogosphere, and to those of us looking for the Rustbelt in our fiction.

    Comment by Christopher Barzak — January 7, 2010 @ 1:00 am |Reply

  2. You’re welcome! This is really important to me, both as a Cleveland resident and as a writer myself. We have a quite unique culture here in the Rust Belt — as well as a far-flung diaspora that’s starting to seek out its heritage. (I hope you’ll also have a look at Cleveland Area History, which I’m co-editor of.)

    Incidentally, One for Sorrow is in my to-read pile, sandwiched between American Splendor and H.L. Mencken on American Literature.

    Comment by cborne — January 7, 2010 @ 1:16 am |Reply

  3. I agree, the culture here is unique, and I wish I found it (and places like it) in fiction more often. I’ll definitely check out the Cleveland Area History, thanks for the link. And I’m honored that One for Sorrow is in your to-read pile!

    Comment by Christopher Barzak — January 7, 2010 @ 1:27 am |Reply

  4. I think you will start finding it more. I think there’s an intellectual interest welling in topics like what went wrong in the heartland, because people are realizing that bad stuff always happens here first. We felt the Great Recession long before it had a name.

    The Rust Belt is a lot different from just the Midwest, a difference that sometimes people are slow to see. The Midwest is too general a description to be very useful anymore. Personally I feel more in common with places like Youngstown, Pittsburgh, Buffalo, and Detroit than with southern Ohio (even Columbus) or with Iowa or rural Indiana.

    If I think of myself as having a cultural heritage or “regional ethnicity”, it’s always in terms of the Rust Belt (one grandfather retired from GM) or the Great Lakes (the other grandfather worked on a ship).

    Comment by cborne — January 7, 2010 @ 1:40 am |Reply

  5. I feel the exact same way. One of my grandfathers died young, working as a member of a road crew in Trumbull County. The other is still alive, but retired from the steel mills in Warren. It feels different from the Midwest in general. It really is the Rustbelt. A sector of the Midwest, but also other regions where industry was lost, regardless of what the industry was. Detroit was cars, for example.

    Comment by Christopher Barzak — January 7, 2010 @ 7:17 am |Reply

  6. [...] took place in the neighborhood where Morris Bird III lived. As Mark Winegardner illustrates in Crooked River Burning, the Hough Riots were as good a symbol as any of Cleveland’s own loss of [...]

    Pingback by Review: The Greatest Thing Since Sliced Bread « Rust Belt Reader — January 30, 2010 @ 11:52 pm |Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Theme: Toni. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.